Saturday, April 23, 2016

I propose a solution!


Hi Everyone,

Before going to our next neuvola visit I figure that I'll take a little break from complaining in order to focus on something positive. A lot of what I've taken on and will be taking on in the future is documenting things that I perceive to be wrong. Still, the best way to elicit positive change is to focus on and accentuate the positive. I've been thinking a lot about things that would be good for Finland, and I think I might be on to something cool and new...

I owe a great deal of credit to a video by Stefan Lindfors for getting my train of thought started toward positive things. The aforementioned video sent my thoughts into an interesting direction: I want to inspire Finns to be the best that we can be. I want to inspire Finns to focus on the things we can do to take control of our own destinies and make the most of our lives. Rather than comparing our car to our neighbor's nicer car, and being happy if his car falls apart, we can focus on getting a suitable, nice car for ourselves.

If you have read any of my previous posts or even just the title of this blog, you may be wondering: "Why is this relevant at all to a cradle-to-grave nanny state?" The answer is quite simple: If we are constantly comparing ourselves to our friends and neighbors, we open ourselves to an authoritative system that is designed to guarantee an equal outcome for everyone. Rather than taking personal initiative to get what we want in life, we simply accept a fate nearly equal to that of everyone else around us. This means, that the best way to avoid succumbing to a nanny state is to proactively take personal responsibility for each area of our lives and teach our children to do the same.



Two Fridays ago, I was introduced to a new friend over lunch. We had a stimulating and imaginative time connecting and talking about many things. In my opinion, the most important thing that we talked about was parenting. We shared a bit about our childhoods and he told about his wonderful children, and the things that they can do. As an expectant father, it was great to get this man's support and advice. It was through him sharing a small, but immensely powerful parenting tactic with me, that I was inspired to even think of this cool and new idea.

My new friend told about a tactic which he and his wife use to teach responsibility to their children. They own a container of poker chips and the children can earn chips of different values by doing different prescribed things. They can spend their poker chips to earn time to use electronics among other rewards. This reminded me of a similar strategy that my own mother implemented in the lives of my brother and me. The system involved stickers, charts, cotton-balls and pretend money, but the underlying principle was the same: parents teach responsibility through a payment system, and children use the payment system to obtain things that they want.

I propose that a similar system be made readily available for children to learn even more than responsibility and the value of money. I believe that we can extend the idea to also teach the value of simultaneously investing in the future and being altruistic. I believe we can boil the idea down to teaching children three basic principles: 


1. Personal responsibility.

2. Investing.

3. Caring for Others.





The basic idea is to start a savings account, and a trust or an investment account, both of which are co-owned by parent and child, the contents of which are given to the child at the age of 18. Children can earn up to a certain amount per week, as determined by the parents, based on how much their responsibilities are "worth." Then we, the parents then teach the children: "50%, or 1/2 of this amount is going into your investment account. We can watch it grow together! 10% of this amount we can decide together how you are going to help others with it. This leaves you with 40%."

We can describe for the children about the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, Doctors Without Borders, etc., and teach the children what sorts of wonderful things these charities do. Then, our children can make an educated decision on whom to help. If a suitable alternative cannot be found, then we just put the money aside and do more research until we find something altruistic that the parent and child can agree upon. After doing this process for a while to learn the value of real money, the child can, if he decides to do so, invest even more of the 40% that he has left if that is what he wants to do. We can make a simple Excel spreadsheet or write a program for a calculator to show how much more money can be made over years through compound returns.

Parents can sign up children of any age. I personally believe that this should begin at as early of an age as possible. For some this might be six or eight years old, for others it might be only three or four. Even if your child is older than this, it is still not too late to start teaching these important values!

My wife and I are thinking, that we'll stick with poker chips or monopoly money until our children are six. At this point we'll likely start our children with up to 20€/week (depending upon performance of required tasks, behavior, and attitude), up to 10€ of which we will invest, 2€ (or more) of which we will donate, and up to 8€ of which our child gets to keep and use as he sees fit. We will then increase the maximum available amount by 5€/year until they are 12 and receiving 50€/week, investing 25€, and donating 5€. Keeping this process going until they are 16, and averaging an approximate 7% return, our child would have 14.670,00€ when he turns 18. This is enough to invest in starting up his own business, paying a down payment on a house, or many other things. When our child is ready for it, we can discuss the pros and cons of any of these strategies.

I haven't yet figured out the logistics of implementing this idea, but figured on putting this out on the internet in hopes of inspiring others to work together to establish a group dedicated to doing this and educating others. Perhaps some might be willing to donate legal advice or money for administration; furthermore, businesses, insurance companies, investment banks, credit unions, purveyors of investment vehicles etc. might be willing to sponsor the administrative and education aspects of this idea. Together, we can help a new generation adopt a "can-do attitude," and teach them personal responsibility, investing, and caring for others.

Yours,

Matt!

Be the first to get updates about what's going on via email straight to your inbox! Enter your email address below:


Delivered by FeedBurner


All images used are solely for nonprofit educational use.

Monday, February 29, 2016

Holy Invasion of Privacy, Badman!

Picture from: http://cdn2-www.playstationlifestyle.net/assets/uploads/2009/04/hiopb.jpg
Used solely for nonprofit, educational purposes.
Hi!

I would like to share a form with you that was given at our first visit to the äitiysneuvola. We are expected to fill this form out and return it. On page 2, we are informed that this information will be kept, and returned to us when our child turns six years old. This doesn't sound too far out of the ordinary, at least not in Finland... except for the fact that all this information is kept by a government-run healthcare system, and the fact that you can opt out is not told to anyone that doesn't ask.

Let's take a look at some of the information that this form gathers. I have the form in its entirety attached to the bottom of this post for your viewing (dis)pleasure, but for now, let's just explore a few of the more juicy tidbits:

Each question has four response choices: Agree, Partially agree, Partially disagree, and Disagree. 

They range from the parents' knowledge about health such as #4, "I am aware that intoxicants (alcohol, drugs) have a negative impact on the fetus," to the parents' own childhood experiences such as #13, "[As a child,] I was accepted for who I was."

The partner relationship aspect is also a big one, with a questions such as #17 and #18 which deal with physical and mental violence, and #21, "I know that our sexual life can be affected by our child's birth," to #26, "I am prepared to make an effort to develop our relationship."

Topics about parenthood, social support, and economic situation come into play, too, with questions like: #33 "Together with my partner we are trying to develop a shared view on how to take care of and raise the child," #41 "I know when I can turn to the maternity clinic," #48 "If necessary, I will try to find new ways of combining work (or studies) and family when the child is born."

However relevant this information might be to developing a healthy family environment, I don't think that it is the government's place to make it their business. I don't think that the government should have the right to demand this sort of personal information from myself or my wife. As responsible citizens, I believe we are in a far better position to be able to deal with these sorts of issues without any government intervention whatsoever. As Henry David Thoreau said, "That government is best which governs least."

As mentioned above, I have included the form at the bottom of this post for you to take a look at it. I'm seriously considering having my wife fill in all the "right" responses, and then filling in all the "wrong" responses myself... either that or just opting out. Such a tough decision...




Either way, if you're interested in hearing the latest, feel free to subscribe using the link below, and if you have something to say, feel free to leave a comment!

Be the first to get updates about what's going on via email straight to your inbox! Enter your email address below:


Delivered by FeedBurner



Page 1

Page 2
Page 3

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Shoutout to Bill Watterson!

Hi!

One of my favorite communicators, Bill Watterson, put together a wonderful piece that summarizes how I often feel about many people who have taken the responsibility to make society work.
Image solely for nonprofit, educational use.

As Bill Watterson once said about this very comic strip, "People will pay for what they want, but not for what they need." As I put together my analysis of my wife's and my visit to the äitiysneuvola, I hope and pray that it gives citizens everywhere the information and the energy to give politicians the swift kick in the butt that they need to get this world on track!

All the best,

-Matt
Be the first to get updates about what's going on via email straight to your inbox! Enter your email address below:


Delivered by FeedBurner


Thursday, February 18, 2016

And so it begins...

Äitiysneuvola!

For most Finns, this word marks the beginning of a long journey. This is the first consultation visit of a new mother to get advice about maternity, and to schedule an ultrasound. The father can come along, too. My wife is 10 weeks pregnant, and we are going together to the äitiysneuvola tomorrow. As a scientist who is well versed in embryology, I'm going to have trouble keeping my mouth shut. Don't worry, though, my wife will make sure that I do!

So, what does this word, "äitiysneuvola," actually mean? When inserted into Google Translate, it translates to the very benign sounding "Maternity Clinic." However, if we look at the etymology of the word by breaking it down into its parts, we find a much more specific answer: "Äitiys" refers to maternity, so that's all fine and good. But, rather than a clinic, "neuvola" refers to a center for guidance. This, at first glance, may seem great, especially to a Finn who is used to outsourcing important decisions to experts. However, I believe that this is the first event in the life of a human being, which increases his/her reliance on the social welfare system and perpetuates the idea that an expert is more qualified to make your life's decisions than you are.

Yes, this visit itself is totally benign. Still, it is vitally important for us to remember that we, the parents, are responsible for raising our children the way they should be raised. Outsourcing this job to the society, and blindly following the directives given by experts would be irresponsible of us.

Don’t get me wrong: my wife and I believe that education is a good thing. Furthermore, we believe that each person should be responsible for educating him/herself in the things that are important, rather than blindly relying on the word of someone else deemed an "expert." We are all for mothers getting as much information as possible to better the care of their children! It would just be better if the information were complete, and up-to-date. Although it takes more time to look at the latest articles in peer-reviewed medical journals, the information you can get from your own research is a lot more thorough and good than what you get from a 1-1/2 hour consultation.

Yes, we are going to the neuvola although we could opt out. We’re doing this for three reasons.

1. Her parents would kill me if my wife didn’t go. After all, as caring parents we’re pretty much “obligated” to do it. Besides, if we pay taxes, we might as well exercise our "right" to two free ultrasounds throughout the course of her pregnancy. Ultrasounds are beneficial, and it will be good to get one (or two).

2. I will be recording the entire consultation on my phone and analyzing it for your benefit. If there is anything to be gained from the neuvola visit, you will find it on this blog, shortly!

3. Even though societal pressure practically forces you to go to the neuvola, we set out to demonstrate that, whether we go to the neuvola or not, we will make our decisions in the best interest of our new child!

All the Best,

Be the first to get updates about what's going on via email straight to your inbox! Enter your email address below:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Matt